Research Design and Sustainability Model
The American Psychological Foundation (APF) Direct Action Visionary Grants seek to fund innovative interventions, based on psychological knowledge, that directly address pressing needs of communities. APF Visionary Priorities: (1) serving marginalized communities, (2) ending prejudice and stigma, (3) preventing violence, and (4) exploring mind-body health connections.
| Funding Program | APF Direct Action Visionary Grant | Maximum Award | Up to $60,000 |
| Sponsor | American Psychological Foundation | LOI Deadline | April 30, 2026 (rolling quarterly) |
| Institution | University of Arizona | Full Proposal | By invitation; evaluated after September 8, 2026 |
Family Adjustment Following Autism Diagnosis
A synthesis of twelve academic works was conducted to examine how families adjust following an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. The review reveals that adjustment is not a linear trajectory from crisis to acceptance but a recursive, relationally embedded process shaped by ambiguity, affect regulation, and the ongoing renegotiation of meaning within the family narrative. The synthesis is organized around three themes:
| Theme | Key Finding | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative Reconstruction |
|
Bury, 1982; Rasmussen et al., 2020; Lappé et al., 2018; Gray, 2002; Naicker et al., 2023 |
| Affective Disruption |
|
Chase, 2022; Ratcliffe, 2020; Nowacka et al., 2025 |
| Emotion Regulation as Mechanism |
|
Hendrix et al., 2022; Enav et al., 2022; Morris et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2026; Woodgate et al., 2008 |
Note. Synthesis includes twelve works: seven addressing the autism context directly (Rasmussen et al., 2020; Lappé et al., 2018; Chase, 2022; Naicker et al., 2023; Hendrix et al., 2022; Enav et al., 2022; Woodgate et al., 2008) and five providing theoretical scaffolding through biographical disruption theory, stigma, phenomenology of absence, co-regulation in child development, and loneliness neuroscience (Bury, 1982; Gray, 2002; Ratcliffe, 2020; Morris et al., 2017; Nowacka et al., 2025; Ma et al., 2026).
Autism spectrum disorder diagnosis is followed by a period of family adjustment where identity, relationships, and imagined futures are reconciled. Despite evidence that cognitive reappraisal, social support, and shared meaning-making moderate reconciliation, no resources are provided to families to scaffold this process over time, contributing to family member isolation, identity disruption, and dysregulated adjustment.
Autism Moon: A 52-Week Journey is a community-sourced bibliotherapy intervention for families following a child's autism diagnosis. The book provides 52 weeks of content contributed by members of the autism community, designed to strengthen family cohesion, resilience, and communication. An embedded longitudinal research design evaluates the intervention's impact on family cohesion, conflict, and resilience across 1, 3, 5, and 10 year measurement time points.
| Project | Autism Moon: A 52-Week Journey for families following ASD diagnosis |
| Amount Requested | $36,000 |
| Intervention | 52-week bibliotherapy guide: art, poetry, psychoeducation, reflective prompts |
| Contributors | Paid contribution ($300) resourced from the Leadership and Education in Neurodevelopmental and Other Disabilities (LEND) nationwide network |
| Accessibility | Braille strip included on print edition; accessible audio on digital edition |
| Design | Single-group longitudinal, repeated measures across 5 time points |
| Data Collection | QR code → REDCap (UofA, HIPAA-compliant), de-identified |
| Sample | N = 80 parents/caregivers; child ASD diagnosis within 24 months |
| Instruments | BFRS (16 items) + FRS6 (6 items); 22 items, ~5 min administration |
| Time Points | Pre (Week 1), Post (Week 52), Year 3, Year 5, Year 10 |
Concurrent to the research study, the physical and digital editions of Autism Moon will be available for purchase and download. The intention is a self-sustaining product cycle where revenues from the book fund the continued availability of the book in perpetuity, with all proceeds beyond production cost directed back to the funding organization.
Figure 1
Sample Book Page, Autism Moon: A 52-Week Journey
Note. Mockup of Week 1 interior page. Final design by professional layout artist. Braille strip reads: "There are no right or wrong answers. Just your family, right now, as you are." QR code links to HIPAA-compliant REDCap survey with auto-populated participant ID and time point.
Figure 2
Sample Two-Page Spread: Contributor Week
Note. Mockup of a sample contributor week. Each two-page spread features original content from one of 50 LEND network contributors. Braille strip on every page. Final design by professional layout artist.
Budget Summary: $36,000 Requested
Table A1
Proposed Budget: Autism Moon: A 52-Week Journey
| Category | Item | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Contributor Compensation | 50 LEND contributors × $300 each | $15,000 |
| Print Production | Prototype copies (10-15, color, card stock) | $450 |
| Print Production | Research study copies (60+, color, card stock) | $1,800 |
| Accessibility | Braille strip embossing (all copies) | $2,000 |
| Design/Layout | Professional book design, typesetting, print-ready files | $3,000 |
| Participant Incentives | Year 3 follow-up: 80 × $15 | $1,200 |
| Participant Incentives | Year 5 follow-up: 80 × $25 | $2,000 |
| Participant Incentives | Year 10 follow-up: 80 × $35 | $2,800 |
| Dissemination | INSAR 2027, registration | $700 |
| Dissemination | INSAR 2027, travel + lodging (international) | $3,500 |
| Dissemination | Conference proceedings publication fee | $500 |
| Legal/Admin | ISBN registration | $125 |
| Contingency | 10% buffer | $2,925 |
| Total Requested | $36,000 | |
Table A2
In-Kind and Zero-Cost Infrastructure
| Item | Provider | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| PI labor (coordination, development, analysis) | PI (volunteer) | $0 |
| REDCap survey hosting (HIPAA-compliant) | UofA CB2 | $0 |
| Instrumentation (BFRS + FRS6) | Open-access | $0 |
| Digital distribution (website + downloads) | HF Spaces (free tier) | $0 |
| Statistical analysis software | Python (scipy, statsmodels) | $0 |
Assessment Battery: BFRS + FRS6 (22 Items)
Fok, C. C. T., Allen, J., Henry, D., & Team, P. A. (2014). The Brief Family Relationship Scale. Assessment, 21(1), 67-72.
Response scale: 0 = Not at all, 1 = Somewhat, 2 = A lot
Table B1
BFRS: Cohesion Subscale (7 Items)
| # | Item |
|---|---|
| 1 | In our family we really help and support each other |
| 2 | In our family we spend a lot of time doing things together at home |
| 3 | In our family we work hard at what we do in our home |
| 4 | In our family there is a feeling of togetherness |
| 5 | My family members really support each other |
| 6 | I am proud to be a part of our family |
| 7 | In our family we really get along well with each other |
Table B2
BFRS: Expressiveness Subscale (3 Items)
| # | Item |
|---|---|
| 8 | In our family we can talk openly in our home |
| 9 | In our family we sometimes tell each other about our personal problems |
| 10 | In our family we begin discussions easily |
Table B3
BFRS: Conflict Subscale (6 Items; Reverse Scored)
| # | Item |
|---|---|
| 11 | In our family we argue a lot (R) |
| 12 | In our family we are really mad at each other a lot (R) |
| 13 | In our family we lose our tempers a lot (R) |
| 14 | In our family we often put down each other (R) |
| 15 | My family members sometimes are violent (R) |
| 16 | In our family we raise our voice when we are mad (R) |
Chow, K. M., Tang, W. K. S., Chan, W. H. G., Sit, W. H. J., Choi, K. C., & Chan, S. (2024). A 6-item Family Resilience Scale (FRS6) for measuring longitudinal trajectory of family adjustment. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 251.
Response scale: 1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Agree, 4 = Strongly agree
Table B4
FRS6: Family Resilience Items (6 Items)
| # | Item | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | We can compromise when problems come up | Communication & Connectedness |
| 18 | We can talk about the way we communicate in our family | Communication & Connectedness |
| 19 | We define problems positively to solve them | Communication & Connectedness |
| 20 | We discuss problems and feel good about the solutions | Communication & Connectedness |
| 21 | We can survive if another problem comes up | Positive Framing |
| 22 | We feel people in this community are willing to help in an emergency | External Resources |
| Subscale | Source | Items | Range | Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesion | BFRS | 1-7 | 0-14 | Sum; higher = greater cohesion |
| Expressiveness | BFRS | 8-10 | 0-6 | Sum; higher = greater expressiveness |
| Conflict | BFRS | 11-16 | 0-12 | Reverse score, then sum; higher = less conflict |
| Resilience | FRS6 | 17-22 | 6-24 | Sum; higher = greater resilience |
Note. Total administration time: approximately 5 minutes (22 items). Administered via QR code at five time points: Pre (Week 1), Post (Week 52), Year 3, Year 5, Year 10. Both instruments are open-access and free for research use with attribution.
Autism Moon: A 52-Week Journey | Grant Proposal Figures | April 2026